Biranchi Poudyal
Biranchi Poudyal

PhD Candidate · Sydney, Australia

Biranchi Poudyal

Responsible AI & AI Governance Researcher

Generative AI · AI Governance · Human–AI Systems · Higher Education

I research how institutions govern, evaluate and take accountability for generative AI systems — testing whether governance produces accountable, consistent decisions as AI capability increases. Higher education is my primary application domain and evidence base: I study how universities can respond with policy that is clear, fair and workable.

0

Research themes & methods

0

Research projects

0

Case studies analysed

0

Writing samples

Live tool

Assignment Thinking Assistant

A live web tool that coaches students through structured thinking on an assignment — planning, questioning and evaluating their own reasoning — instead of generating answers for them.

What I work on

Areas of expertise

Doctoral project

Current research focus

“The Role of Generative AI and Agency in the Epistemological Foundations of Contemporary Pedagogy”

My doctoral research asks how epistemic agency — a learner's capacity to form, justify and take responsibility for knowledge — is preserved, redistributed or eroded when cognitive work is shared with AI systems, and what that means for assessment, integrity and AI governance in higher education. It sits within a broader research programme on AI governance and responsible AI deployment, for which higher education is currently the most tested application domain.

About the doctoral project →

Portfolio

Selected research projects

All projects →
Empirical Study Completed

Testing How University AI Governance Holds Up Under Pressure

A scenario-based method that tests whether a university's public AI-governance documents still produce an accountable decision as AI use moves from simple assistance toward more autonomous, delegated action.

Key insight — The most common weak point wasn't a missing rule — it was a named responsible role with no specific criteria, safeguards or review to back it up.

Document analysis · Scenario-based stress testing · Structured coding protocol · Independent reliability checking

Last updated 26 August 2026

Policy Analysis Completed

Do University AI Policies Actually Decide Cases?

A vignette-based test of whether the published policy environment at 20 Australian universities actually resolves common AI-assisted student behaviours, or leaves them ambiguous.

Key insight — Transparent, verified AI use was consistently the most clearly resolved by published policy — ambiguous or partially-disclosed use often wasn't resolved at all.

Vignette methodology · Structured policy classification · Dual-coder reliability testing

Last updated 26 August 2026

Technical Project In progress

AI Policy Extraction System

A Python pipeline using web extraction and the Gemini API to collect, structure and organise university AI-policy information, with human verification of every record.

Key insight — Every AI-extracted field is treated as a claim, not data, until a human checks it against the source — extraction speed never substitutes for verification.

Python · Web extraction · Gemini API · Structured JSON outputs · Human verification workflow

Last updated 28 July 2026

In print

Selected publications

All publications →

Stress-testing university AI governance: A prospective method for locating policy breakpoints

Poudyal, B. · 2026 · arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.28925

Abstract

Introduces Institutional AI Governance Stress Testing (IAGST), a method combining controlled capability escalation, a frozen documentary corpus and a six-dimensional governance response chain to locate where university AI governance breaks down. Applied across 133 documents from five Western Australian universities using 15 scenarios (75 encounters), the results show that while responsible authority roles typically existed, they lacked sufficient decision criteria, and that governance reliability declined sharply as AI use moved from augmentation toward autonomous substitution.

View online

Reclaiming Epistemic Agency: A Critical Framework for Human-Generative AI Co-Agency in Education

Poudyal, B. · 2026 · arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.26937

Abstract

Examines how generative AI redistributes epistemological authority in education — from teachers, to students, to machines. Reviewing this shift through Distributed Agency, Self-Determination Theory, TPACK and SAMR, the paper argues existing frameworks fail to address equitable distribution of power, data ownership and accountability, and introduces the Ecological Co-Agency Framework, which anchors relational, regulatory and pedagogical dimensions of agency in human accountability for knowledge production.

View online

Who I am

Biography

I am a PhD candidate based in Sydney, Australia, researching the governance and responsible deployment of generative AI systems. My work centres on a practical governance question: as AI systems take on more cognitive and decision-making work, how do institutions preserve human oversight, accountability and authority over outcomes that matter? Higher education — where this question is playing out fastest — is my primary evidence base, through my doctoral research into how generative AI reshapes teaching, learning and assessment.

Alongside conceptual research, I build practical tools — AI-governance evaluation pipelines, decision frameworks and professional guidance — that translate research into things institutions can use.

Full biography and research profile →

Keep exploring

Explore the full portfolio